Home » forums » General Information » General

Unassigned submissions

I am wondering why DNA test #54166 is listed in the results grouping as Unassigned, when it is plainly identified as a descendant of Pleasant Casey of Tennessee. Why is it not grouped with the SC-TN Casey grouping?

By fiddler at 2007-07-10 13:33 | General | login or register to post comments | previous forum topic | next forum topic

Results Chart Updated

Sorry for the delay, but I've got the results chart on our site updated to match our current status. The good news is, our chart is getting larger, but I was beginning to run into issues pasting such a large results chart into our site here. That's been fixed and we should be good now. Take a look at the results chart.

By Chris Casey at Fri, 2007-09-28 22:02 | login or register to post comments

Results Chart Updated

Thanks for your good work, Chris. Looks like some new people added to the charts.

I thought that testing was confidential, but I see that the name column has been changed from the distant ancestor to the name of the person tested. Hopefully, this is in error! The ancestor is the identification that I would hope to see, not the name of the person tested. Those of us working on the lines usually know who the tested person was anyway, but we really need to know the distant ancestors represented by the data. Can this be addressed?

By fiddler at Sun, 2007-09-30 19:39 | login or register to post comments

Chart Fixed

Sorry for the error, you're correct that I typically post the version of the chart with the most distant known ancestor. With that last update, I mistakenly posted the version with real names. Once it was pointed out to me, I took the chart down, and I've now updated it with the correct anonymous version.

By Chris Casey at Sun, 2007-10-07 16:52 | login or register to post comments