Kerry House Party

see the photo album

Our Kerry House Party today was a great success. We had about 20 guests, most of whom we were meeting for the first time, and we enjoyed a backyard cookout with burgers, hot dogs, and the chance to dial into a conference call with more than 2000 other House Parties to hear Senator Kerry talk about how he’ll repair the damage of four years under President Bush.

Fahrenheit 9/11 – I Dare You To See It

It’s probably no surprise to those who know me that I was eager to see Michael Moore’s film, Fahrenheit 9/11. My wife and I were among those in the full house of the first showing on opening day at our local theater. I expected to enjoy the movie, and I did. Anyone who’s seen one of Moore’s previous documentaries, regardless of whether you’re supportive or hostile to the points he makes, has to admit he’s a skillful filmmaker who is viciously funny.

What I was not prepared for was how viscerally moving the movie was. There are certainly plenty of laughs, just about all at President Bush’s expense. But there are also many parts that are difficult to watch, particularly the graphic scenes of wounded and dead Iraqis and Americans in Iraq, recovering soldiers in the U.S., and grieving families who wish their family member had only been wounded.

And for what? Weapons of mass destruction? An immenent threat to the United States? Any connection to Al-Queda or 9/11? A warm welcome from liberated Iraqis suffering under despotic rule? What? The justifications just don’t hold any water. George Bush, our court-appointed President, used the tradgedy of 9/11 to carry out his own agenda of an unjustified war against Iraq. It’s that simple. And they impeached Clinton for lying about sex.

So can a movie make a difference? My own feeling is that anyone who saw Fahrenheit 9/11 would be very hard pressed to challenge the facts it presents. We’ve seen them all before, strung out over the last three years, from the complicities of Bush’s ‘win’ in Florida, the obliviousness to terrorist threats pre- 9/11, and the trampling of civil liberties post. But when pulled together and viewed in a grander context, you are reminded, embarressed, and angered. Hopefully angered to action.

If the movie can make a convincing argument against the re-election of George Bush, the challenge lies in bringing the audience to the movie, and I can imagine three general types of individuals who might be in the audience; the choir, the undecided/uninvolved, and the Bush believers.

‘Preaching to the choir’, is a well known idiom meaning ‘Trying to make believers out of people who already believe’. It’s an expression of futility. In this instance, I’m in the choir, so is this movie wasted on me? No. Because the choir must be motivated. This choir needs to be reminded, be informed, and be angered to action.

How about the undecided/uninvolved? It’s frankly beyond me how any American who is paying attention can be undecided about the current state and direction of our national affairs. The uninvolved baffle me further, but to our great national shame, way too many voters in America just don’t bother to vote. Can these individuals be brought to the theater for Fahrenheit 9/11? At least they won’t necessarily be hostile to such a film in advance, and certainly could not fail to have been moved to some greater degree of attention following.

And the Bush believers, can they gain anything from Fahrenheit 9/11? I imagine that some will attend in order to learn its contents and attempt to debunk them. But I imagine pre-conceptions of this film as nothing but a Hollywood smear of President Bush is more than enough to keep the majority of Bush believers watching anything but this.

So dare them to view it. Challenge a Bush believer to watch this movie and continue to defend this President afterwards. Buy their ticket, and pay for a meal afterwards to talk about it. Offer a trade, and give two hours of your attention to watching whatever they want you to watch… even if you must spend it ‘Clockwork Orange’-style with your eyelids held open watching still continuing coverage of grass growing on Reagan’s grave.

Whichever audience you are in, you should see this movie. You owe it to yourself, and to our country, to look at the facts and reach your own conclusions. Failing that, we deserve whatever President the court appoints.

Chris’ Top Ten Milestones for Congress on the Internet

or… Highlights and Lowlights for the Hill on the Net

  1. Senator Robb accepts e-mail (late ’93)
    Hill staffers still haven’t forgiven him

     

  2. Senator Kennedy launches web site (May ’94)
    How’s this for an easy to remember URL?
    http://www.ai.mit.edu/iiip/projects/kennedy/homepage.html

     

  3. House Republicans restrict access to Committee Minority sites (6/96)
    Hill web becomes a political weapon

     

  4. Animations abound (early 97)
    Waving flags, flying letters, & Rep. Traficant ‘Bangin’ Away’

     

  5. Write-Your-Rep & Web Forms (early 97)
    Attempting to stem the e-mail flow with zip lookups and web forms

     

  6. Daschle Tree Cam (11/97)
    It’s not just about politics, and a tradition is born.

     

  7. Starr Report goes Online (9/98)
    Hill servers grind to a halt under the weight of the demand

     

  8. Senate get hacked, twice (5/99, 6/99)
    Senate staff access restricted as a result

     

  9. 100 Senators Online (3/00)
    Illinois Sen. Peter Fitzgeral makes it unanimous

     

  10. Senator Clinton’s Day One Web Launch (1/01)
    Sen. Clinton launches site on day one, fastest yet.

Disagree? Don’t sit there stewing about it, tell me! You’ll feel better…chris@casey.com.
Then go write your own list 🙂


© 2001 by Chris Casey
Delivered at American University’s Forum on Congress and the Internet, 5/4/01. (see the video)

CaseyDorin Internet Productions wins Golden Dot award for Innovation

Golden Dot Award CaseyDorin Internet Productions was awarded the Golden Dot award for Innovation at the seventh annual PoliticsOnline conference held today in Washington, DC for their work developing the mobile edition of algore.com. The Innovation award is given to the nominee who has “developed and utilized the best new ways for conducting election campaigns which, if emulated, would enhance American democracy”. As campaigns further develop their use of the Internet, it is a certainty that they will continue to seek to find new ways to deliver their content and communicate with voters. The algore.com mobile edition reached more than 10,000 subscribers, delivering updated news and information directly onto their handheld computers as quickly as it was available on the algore.com web site.

1 15 16 17